Books on Northeast India (Part-1)
The categories of “mainstream” and “margins” are socially constructed
through specific political and historical contexts, shaping dominant ideas of
nationhood and their corresponding exclusions. Northeast India occupies a
distinctive place within this framework. Often imagined as a frontier, the
region’s incorporation into the Indian nation has followed a political
trajectory different from that of much of the rest of the country.
The books listed below bring together key texts that examine how this
history has shaped the Northeast’s politics, identities, and relationship with
the Indian state. The list is divided into two parts. The first part includes books tracing
the evolution of the Northeast as a frontier, writings by Indian officials
offering insight into post-Independence policy, and major scholarly works that
conceptualize the Northeast as a region. The second part focuses on
state-specific studies, organized for the reader’s convenience. However, the
list below is not exhaustive and covers only recent, easily available books.
Part-1
Northeast as a Colonial
Frontier
The initial
conceptualization of the Northeast as a frontier significantly shaped the region’s
politics. Benjamin Hopkins’s Ruling the
Savage Periphery (2020) offers a global perspective on frontier governmentality across colonial regimes. In the specific
context of Northeast India, Sanghamitra Misra’s Becoming a Borderland (2011) explores the politics of space and
identity in Northeast India’s borderlands from the early 1800s to the 1930s,
critiquing post-colonial histories for their fragmented and civilizational
perspectives. Beginning with the pre-colonial Mughal period, the book examines
the negotiated processes of state formation and transitions into the colonial
era, focusing on the East India Company’s early interventions. Gunnel
Cederlöf’s Founding an Empire on India’s
North-Eastern Frontiers (2013) investigates the unsettled decades from the
1790s to the 1830s, during which the British East India Company attempted to
dominate trade routes linking India, Burma, and China. It analyzes how climate,
ecology, and administrative practices shaped subject formation and offers a
fresh perspective on the foundational years of colonial state-building in the
region. Reeju Ray’s Placing the Frontier
in British North-East India (2023) examines the 19th-century intersection
of colonial law, space, and indigenous place-making in the Northeast frontier.
It highlights the legal limbo of frontier inhabitants, who were excluded as
British subjects yet incorporated into the colonial legal framework, revealing
their dual role as both disruptions and integral components of the imperial
project. These works provide rich insights into the historical complexities of
borderlands, emphasizing themes of space, identity, law, and colonial
state-making in the Northeast. British political agent Alexander Mackenzie’s History
of the Relations of the Government with the Hill Tribes of the North-East
Frontier of Bengal (1866) provides an original source. This appears to be
one of the earliest uses of the term “North-East” and the “frontier” included
Himalayan kingdoms and hill tribes located north, east, and south of the Assam
Valley, stretching between Bengal and independent Burma.
A Peek into Post-independence
Policy
In post-colonial
India, several officials documented the government’s perspectives and
strategies regarding the Northeast, offering invaluable insights into official
thinking at the time. The Constituent Assembly debates on the Fifth and Sixth
Schedules are particularly significant, as they reflect foundational
discussions about governance in tribal areas. Savyasaachi has comprehensively
compiled these debates in Tribal
Forest-Dwellers and Self-Rule (1998), accompanied by a compelling
introduction. Verrier Elwin’s A
Philosophy for NEFA (1957) provides a unique window into the Nehruvian
era’s official policy and ideological stance toward the Northeast. Further
perspectives on regional governance and development are provided by Nari
Rustomji’s Imperiled Frontiers (1983)
and B. P. Singh’s The Problem of Change
(1987). Rustomji’s work reflects his experiences as a senior administrator in
the region, highlighting the geopolitical and cultural complexities of managing
border areas prone to external and internal pressures. Singh’s book critically
examines the challenges of development, focusing on the social and cultural
impacts of state-led initiatives in the Northeast.
Expanding this
discourse, B. G. Verghese’s India’s
Northeast Resurgent (1996) explores the evolving policy frameworks that
shaped the region’s trajectory. The book examines the Northeast’s potential as
a bridge to Southeast Asia while analyzing its developmental and strategic
importance. These insights are supplemented by B. N. Mullik, India’s first
Intelligence Bureau chief, provides an insider’s account of security and
strategic challenges in the Northeast through his books My Years with Nehru: The Chinese Betrayal (1971, Vol. 1) and My Years with Nehru, 1948–1964 (1971,
Vol. 3). These volumes detail critical events, such as the 1962 Sino-Indian War
and the broader security dynamics of the Northeast, offering valuable insights
into the intersection of national security, regional politics, and the
challenges of managing border areas in a newly independent India. These works
offer a multifaceted understanding of Northeast India, encompassing governance,
security, development, and policymaking.
"Northeast" as a Category
of Scholarly Analysis
The inadequacy of
tribal policies and the contingent constitutional arrangements they produced
came under intense scrutiny beginning in the 1960s. This period saw a series of
nationalist movements, starting with the Naga and Mizo uprisings, followed by similar
assertions from most of the ethnocultural minority groups in Northeast India.
Venkata Rao’s A Century of Tribal
Politics in North East India (1976) serves as an excellent foundation for
understanding the region’s political evolution. The book delves into
pre-colonial political systems across various communities, their transformation
during the colonial era, and their subsequent development in post-colonial
times. Rao provides a detailed analysis of the functioning of District Councils
in the region and the dynamics of hill politics that ultimately led to the creation
of Meghalaya as a separate state. S.K. Chaube’s Hill Politics in Northeast India (1973) builds on this
understanding, offering valuable insights into the intricacies of hill
politics. In more recent years, scholars have undertaken extensive and nuanced
explorations of the political, social, and cultural dimensions of the region’s
diverse ethnic groups, significantly enriching the field of Northeast Indian
studies.
The political
movements that have shaped Northeast India are examined in depth through a
comparative lens, with Sanjib Baruah’s works providing invaluable insights into
the region’s complex politics. His seminal books India Against Itself (1999), Durable
Disorder (2005), and In the Name of
the Nation (2020) are key contributions that offer a deep understanding of
the region’s political struggles, identity formation, and state-society
relations. Durable Disorder
highlights the persistence of political disorder in the region, focusing on how
the state’s approach has shaped local identities and political realities. In the Name of the Nation critically
examines the role of nationalism in the region, exploring the complex interplay
between national identity and local ethnic identities. Baruah’s edited volume Beyond Counter-insurgency (2009) brings
together a diverse range of essays that explore the region’s political and
social dynamics, particularly in relation to insurgency, governance, and
identity. The collection provides a nuanced understanding of the issues that
have defined the Northeast’s troubled history with the Indian state.
In addition to
these, his edited book, Ethnonationalism
in India (2012), offers a broader comparative framework, situating the
Northeast within the wider context of ethnonationalism in India. This book not
only examines the Northeast but also explores how ethnonationalist movements
have played out across India, making it an essential resource for understanding
the region’s politics in relation to national and ethnic identity. Furthermore,
Baruah’s articles and working papers offer more focused analyses of specific
issues affecting the Northeast, including citizenship, migration, and
governance challenges. These writings further enrich the discourse on the
region, offering critical perspectives that complement his books and edited
volumes. Collectively, Baruah’s body of work has shaped the academic and
political understanding of Northeast India, offering both theoretical
frameworks and grounded analyses that have significantly influenced the study
of the region’s complex politics.
Subir Bhaumik’s Troubled Periphery (2009) offers an
insightful exploration of the political crisis in Northeast India, examining
the dynamics of insurgency, state responses, and the broader regional context.
Similarly, Udayon Misra’s The Periphery
Strikes Back (2000) and India’s
North-East (2014) provide in-depth analyses of the political movements and
insurgency in the region, offering perspectives on how these movements have
evolved over time and their impact on the larger Indian state. KS Subramanian’s
State, Policy, and Conflicts in Northeast
India (2016) further delves into the state’s policy responses to the
persistent conflicts, shedding light on the complex relationship between the
state and the region’s insurgent movements. The fate of Northeast India is
intricately tied to the politics of its neighboring countries, a theme explored
in Avinash Paliwal’s India’s Near East
(2024). This book examines the geopolitical and security concerns that shape
India’s interactions with its two neighbors: Bangladesh and Myanmar,
particularly in relation to Northeast India.
Recent
scholarship has moved beyond traditional discussions of insurgency and ethnic
politics to explore a wider range of themes, capturing the changing dynamics of
Northeast India. Sanjay Hazarika’s The
Strangers of the Mist (1994) and Strangers
No More (2018) offer a nuanced exploration of the region’s evolving
identity, reflecting on the shifts in its social and political landscape over
time. This shift in focus is further evident in edited volumes like Yasmin
Saikia and Amit R. Baishya’s Northeast
India (2017), which examines the region’s complex issues from diverse
perspectives, and Geographies of
Difference (2018), edited by Mélanie Vandenhelsken, Meenaxi
Barkataki-Ruscheweyh, and Bengt G. Karlsson, which delves into the
socio-cultural and geographical factors that shape the region. Bhagat Oinam and
Dhiren Sadokpam’s Northeast India
(2018) offers further insights into the region’s contemporary issues, while
Neeladri Bhattacharya and Joy Pachuau’s Landscape,
Culture, and Belonging (2019) explores how cultural landscapes contribute
to notions of belonging in the Northeast.
Arkotong
Longkumer’s The Greater India Experiment
(2021) examines the rise of Hindutva politics in the region, exploring the
intersection of nationalism, identity, and politics in contemporary Northeast
India. Additionally, Jelle J. P. Wouters and Tanka B. Subba’s edited volume, The Routledge Companion to Northeast India
(2023), offers a comprehensive perspective on the region's political, social,
and cultural aspects, showcasing a range of scholarly insights. Moreover, there
have been significant meta-historical explorations of the region. In Forgotten Friends (2013), Indrani
Chatterjee investigates the pan-Himalayan socio-cultural connections among
communities, focusing on the roles of monasteries and marriage in forging
cross-border relations. In contrast, Jangkhomang Guite’s Against State, Against History (2018), drawing on James Scott’s The Art of Not Being Governed (2009),
challenges these narratives by examining the resistance to state authority and
historical structures in the region. These works collectively contribute to a
deeper and more nuanced understanding of Northeast India’s politics, identity,
and history.

Comments
Post a Comment